Political course

Democracy presupposes a constant choice of political course. The policy that takes into account the interests of the strongest majority is being put into practice. In economics, and then politics, it is those who can offer the most wealth to their supporters. It can be both the path of war and the path of economic development. Ordinary people usually choose the economy, and therefore democracy usually favors this choice, although it is possible that the people may choose a ruler who prefers war.

But even if we choose the development of the economy, as in the case of war, this does not guarantee success and an even distribution of the benefits received.

The economy is the same competition, and above all in the field of new technologies, in the ability to use them, that is, in ways to better organize economic activity. And if in order to implement these ways of organizing the economy, it is necessary to change the government, then it is worth talking about a new political course.

Thus, new technologies that produce more results lead to a desire to implement them, and the process of this implementation eventually leads to policy changes. In this case, we can talk about the best policy as one that better adapts to new technologies. This is on the one hand. On the other hand, better policies are meant to improve the overall welfare, not the welfare of individuals who use these new technologies to further enrich themselves.

Policy proposal

At present, such technology is evident. is the Internet and general digitalization, which inevitably changes or should change the previous policy.

But of all the advantages of the Internet and digital technologies in general, I would like to highlight the potentialability of electronic data to be a document, primarily about the transfer of funds and in the general sense of the execution of obligations or contracts.

Relatively speaking, if the transfer of funds is the execution of a contract, then why not organize them through an electronic network. A rather obvious idea, and nevertheless, it is important in whose interests and for what purposes the digitalization of monetary and any other contractual relations can take place.

I would like it to be in the interests of those people who somehow share my goals and views on how society should be organized.

And at the same time, my desire must be consistent with reality, for which I must have the support of people who share my goals, who, like me, will see this as both a common and personal good.

In general, at the first stage of implementation, my goal is to find people whose interest, in itself, is similar to mine, and they are ready to achieve it, in the same way.

In this sense, the consistency of both goals and methods of achieving it is important. Since if you see a flaw in my method, then it would be reasonable to choose a different, faster method. Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that such ideas as OM are not done alone and, so to speak, by random people, as, for example, things are with some simple works. I mean, if you share the goals of the articles on this site, then a lot really depends on your choice, since there are probably not so many such people, since we see so many problems that, for me, were solved by themselves or would not arise if such people were responsible for them.